UPDATE August 4, 2009 -
FOR CONSUMER ADVOCATES
The US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan threw out prominent funeral director Thomas Lynch’s libel and defamation suit against Funeral Consumers Alliance and two other defendants. On July 31, Judge Robert H. Cleland granted summary judgment for the defendants, ruling that Lynch had no case for libel or defamation.
“We’re delighted the court has upheld FCA’s right to free speech,” said Joshua Slocum, Executive Director. “The Constitution protects Americans’ right to engage in vigorous public debate, and that includes criticizing the words and deeds of public figures like Mr. Lynch. Simply because the target of that criticism does not enjoy it does not make such critique illegal. FCA will continue commenting on matters of importance to funeral consumers, and that commentary may take the form of critiquing the writing or statements of prominent funeral directors. We expect this ruling will discourage any disgruntled funeral industry figures from attempting in the future to intimidate and silence consumer organizations through legal bullying.”
Click READ MORE for the rest of the story. . .
Lynch filed suit against Funeral Consumers Alliance, the FCA of Idaho, Funeral Ethics Organization, and FEO Executive Director Lisa Carlson, in September of 2008. He accused the defendants of defaming his reputation and libeling him because of various articles and documents the defendants published. In FCA’s case, Lynch claimed a PowerPoint presentation titled “Deconstructing Thomas Lynch” — a piece that critiqued one of Lynch’s widely read syndicated articles on funerals — made libelous, false statements against him.
The Court disagreed:
None of the evidence presented by Plaintiffs exhibits a reckless disregard for the truth or knowledge that statements were false. In fact, many of the statements alleged to support a finding of malice appear, based on the record before the court, to be true, and certainly [Plaintiffs] have not produced evidence that shows them to be patently false.
Here's a .pdf copy of the court's ruling.
September 24, 2008
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
UPDATE 1/21/2009 - Detroit's weekly paper covers the Lynch lawsuit.
South Burlington, VT. - In an attempt to stifle legitimate criticism from consumer advocates, Michigan funeral director and author Thomas Lynch sued the oldest and largest national nonprofit funeral consumer advocacy organization in federal court September 12. Lynch's suit, filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, accuses Funeral Consumers Alliance, Inc., of "defamation," and causing "substantial economic injury" and "harm to [the] business reputation" of Lynch's funeral home businesses in Michigan. The document in question is a PowerPoint presentation titled "Deconstructing Thomas Lynch," available at www.funerals.org. The presentation quotes an article by Lynch and criticizes the article's presentation and viewpoint.
"To call this lawsuit ‘frivolous' would be too kind - it's outrageous," said FCA Executive Director Joshua Slocum. "Mr. Lynch appears unaware of the constitutional and common law rights citizens and journalists enjoy in this country. We don't expect him to enjoy FCA's critique, but his irritation does not cancel the rights of consumer advocates to publish fair comment on and criticism of his writings. Even worse, his attempt to extract money from a nonprofit charity is reprehensible."
"Mr. Lynch is entitled to his point of view, and we are entitled to disagree with it," FCA's Slocum said. "He is a public figure who has offered insight into American funeral customs. But he is not a disinterested party. Consumer advocates are within their rights to point out that Mr. Lynch's favored funeral rituals happen to be among the most profitable for the conventional funeral home industry. Families planning funerals deserve to learn about all the available options, and about the commercial interests that may influence how a funeral home presents those."
"Funeral Consumers Alliance will not be intimidated or silenced by Mr. Lynch," Slocum continued. "We were formed as a national organization in 1963 to advocate for the rights of grieving families to choose funerals they find meaningful, dignified, and affordable - whatever those choices may be. We will fight this lawsuit vigorously, and we will continue our work on behalf of the American public, whether or not industry heavyweights approve of it."
Funeral Consumers Alliance, Inc., is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit charity headquartered in Vermont. FCA is a federation of nearly 100 nonprofit funeral consumer information societies from Maine to Hawaii. Originally formed in 1963 as the Continental Association of Funeral and Memorial Societies, FCA and its member organizations were instrumental in the passage of the Federal Trade Commission's Funeral Rule in 1984 - a funeral consumer's "bill of rights" guaranteeing grieving families the right to accurate information and freedom of choice in funeral arrangements. Visit us at www.funerals.org.








The legal papers are available for anyone to read on the PACER system (computerized docket) at the Federal District courts. Rest assured FCA members, this lawsuit is not going anywhere. Do not let it distract you from the FCA mission or goals. If I thought it had any chance of success, I would volunteer my time for the cause. I understand the FCA has retained counsel and I know the attorney has the competency to handle this expeditiously on his own.
1. To live in a country where the law protects citizens' rights to fairly comment and critique the actions of public figures, including, most especially, the right to point out things one finds unsavory, even if said public figures and admirers don't like it.
2. To live under a legal system which, in marked contrast to that of the UK, finds such rights (and the related concepts of truth as an absolute defense, and free expression of commentary and opinion) far more important to preserve than assuaging the indignation of public figures or their admirers.
I wish you all the very best.
Josh Slocum
Funeral Consumers Alliance
P.S. to Mr. Callender - Your claim that your sympathies usually lie with FCA is belied by your willingness to make such a reactionary comment. Those whose sympathies are truly in accord with another party don't generally assume that other party has no basis for their actions. Sympathetic people usually think to themselves, "there might be more to this situation than I know, even it if it's not immediately apparent to me."
You are a disputatious fellow, Mr Slocum: the ferocity of your indignation speaks more loudly than, and undermines, any case you have to make. I suspect you know perfectly well that freedom of expression is enshrined in UK law. Don't be silly.
I cannot return your good wishes, ironically or otherwise. I hope you will be forensically dismantled.
Having read the nasty, hysterical press release and hostile e-mail exchanges from their CEO, I am suddenly extremely wary.
There's something bullying about their tone, and their sleazy attack of Tom Lynch contrasts so vividly with Mr. Lynch's kind, warm, heartfelt sincerity. Can the FCA be so hungry for members that it has to resort to such cheap, shrill tactics?
Not only do I hope Tom Lynch wins his suit (with costs - except that they would come from the pockets of the punters who support the FCA), but I hope the FCA dismisses Mr Slocum for bad behaviour, and replaces him with someone I can trust.
With no passive aggressive 'best wishes', James Showers UK
pat lynch on the link above on youtube at funeralfuturist calls jessica mitford's, "the american way of death"....satirical and not real"...unlike their pbs documentary "the undertaking"...which was real. is that not slander towards the mitford family or jessica's estate?
at the the time of publication in 1963 here were some descriptions of this "satirical...not real" book:
"A BOMBSHELL OF A BOOK..."crowded with facts every American should know." - The New York Times
"AT LAST SOMEONE HAS SPOKEN OUT and shattered the sanctimonious silence which has been shielding America's multi-million dollar burial racketeers from public scrutiny."
- The Chicago Times
"THE BEST EVER WRITTEN ON THE SUBJECT." - Harry Golden
"A BRILLIANT CASE AGAINST THE WHOLE INDUSTRY."
- The New Yorker
"A DOCUMENT WHICH IS TO THE UNDERTAKING WHAT
'SILENT SPRING' WAS TO THE PESTICIDE BUSINESS"
- The San Francisco Chronicle
"A BRILLIANT BOOK....MUST READING FOR ALL OF US."
- Cosmopolitan
in my opinion, the lynches are a bunch of clowns for trying to sue a consumer watchdog group and are out of touch with reality for still trying to peddle $10,000.00 funerals and $2000.00 direct cremations in one of the most economic depressed states in america.
Cast anyone who disagrees with you, into the light of disgrace. Shame on you. Spend your time helping people not trying to tear people down.
Open your eyes, J. Augustine. We've spent 46 years since our founding helping everyday people make decisions about funerals they find dignified, and affordable. If you can't see that because you're all worked up over your favorite author-undertaker being criticized, then shame on you. Until you have a reasonable argument about why FCA should be sued in federal court for disagreeing with a public figure, take your melodrama somewhere else.
Thank You Josh!!!
Bob Davis
Budget Casket and Davis Funeral Chapel
Ft. Worth, Tx
I am so glad the judge was not related to the the funeral director in this case. A local judge here in Louisiana told a family, "my family was in the funeral business for 40 years and I will never rule against them." The first female senator in LOUISIANA was a woman who owns around 10 funeral homes and has her daughter on the louisiana funeral board right now.
Did Josh say it's a state law you have to purchase a vault?
Did Josh say we bury treasure but burn the trash?
Did Josh say he won't accept your insurance unless you purchase everything funeral related from him?
Did Josh say it is illegal to purchase caskets anywhere but the funeral home?
Did Josh void a school nurse's burial policy she paid $500 for when minimum wage was $1/hr and bill her $8000-$500=$7500
No, these are the things we want to stop. Funeral homes want to keep scaring people into overpaying.
I am currently being subpoenaed to the la funeral board for advertising and referring families to funeral homes. The funeral industry wants to make me stop informing consumers about their right of choice and how to save thousands by shopping around (yes, even a funeral). I want to take them to federal court myself, but I don't want them to fold. I want them to pay!
If you support consumer choice like the FCA, how can you be against deconstructing any funeral home? Are you guilty of robbing the elderly? Then you have nothing to worry about, right. If you are guilty, you have something to worry about. Funeral directors here say that I am a known felon. I have one speeding ticket, guess that's it. How did they find out.
The court ruled correctly. If FCA misquoted, mislead, or tried to tarnish a truly good person the court should have ruled against them. But I know of no influence the consumer group would have over that judge like kinship, money or political influence. I can not say how pleased the funeral consumer alliance was not stifled by a corrupt funeral, political or judicial system. Consumers deserve free speech and free trade.